Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Hate Mail


Hate Mail - Skeptics vs Conspiracy Theories

Sender: Dave <>
Subject: Skeptics vs Conspiracy Theories
Type: Regular
Added: Oct 31, 2011
Sent to: Editing Committee

We received an insane email from the guy who runs and also, he tried to mask his email as, but really it should've been If you check out this guys web sites, it's just insanity beyond the pale. We didn't feel the need to respond to this, because he tried to hide his email address, he clearly didn't want us to. Interestingly though, isn't it sort of hypocritical, a person who claims we don't publish our email addresses (yet somehow he managed to find us) tries to hide his?

Lesson: don't make up terms like "hijacker-exculpatory" and post them all over the Internet. It makes it really easy to Google you.


Thank you for the link to the 911 University College of Disinformation Recognition! (BTW, do you always love what you do not comprehend?)

Conspiracies have long been known to occur between friends, associates, acquaintances, strangers, rivals, opponents, and even enemies. Perhaps that's why the word exists. Every day of the week, they are proven (or 'proven') by prosecutors in courtrooms.

Sadly, it appears as though most of the 'skeptics' at could not recognize a conspiracy theory if it smacked them in the face! Mostly, they seem to just amuse themselves (and some seem to be Very easily amused...!), and contribute to "the noise", which doubles as disinfo whenever any honest truth-seekers set out to try to separate the wheat from the chaff...

BY DEFINITION, the official government hijacker-blaming legend of 9/11 _IS_ a conspiracy theory! (Did you know/realize that?) The self-named and -proclaimed "911truth" liars FAKE-'oppose' that bogus legend/theory. (...sometimes when "the experts" are wrong, they are not mistaken, but lying!!! And fake opposition fools most of the people most of the time...) 911U's CoDR strives to be honestly skeptical of both the official government hijacker-blaming conspiracy theory of 9/11 (and those who still swallow/cling to it), as well as of those who fake-oppose it.

And that amuses multiple identities at!??! How interesting (and revealing?)...!!! (Please share this message with them, since you seem to be the only one brave enough, or sufficiently interested in exchanging information and thus possibly learning something, to provide an email address, for which you are thanked.)

Here's some more 'comedy' (1 web site and 1 web page) for skepticproject hyenas: - publishes well-documented and -substantiated hijacker-exculpatory 9/11 evidence that has been suppressed and ignored or disparaged and dismissed by not just the government, media, and academia ( many college physics professors _ever_ questioned how a bullet supposedly fired from behind and to the right of JFK's head could possibly have made it snap violently back and to the left? or, for that matter, wondered aloud how a single point-source explosion in OK City could possibly have caused such highly asymmetrical damage to the federal building? Have you ever heard of General Benton K. Partin?...), but also by the fake, phony "911truth" agents/minions/fools!!! (911blimp also ASKS why Democrats have always refused to investigate, question, or even acknowledge the repeated public voluntary self-incriminating 9/11 treason confession statements of GW Bush -- 12/4/01 in FL and 1/5/02 in CA. Why do you suppose that "911truth" agents/minions also ign!
ore the fact that the Pentagon, via FOIA response, substantiated Bush's repeated public loose-lips-sink-ships 9/11 witness statements!? It will be interesting to see how humorous the hyenas find such questions and evidence, should they ever stop chuckling long enough, and ever get serious enough, to dare to touch the topic honestly and intelligently, assuming they're capable, that is...) - also publishes widely-ignored and -suppressed evidence. I'm sure idiots, fools, and morons [will] find lots to easily amuse themselves on this old web site, but please [try to] focus on this one incisive little article: Just as presents widely-suppressed hijacker-exculpatory 9/11 evidence, this web page presents facts and evidence (which are very pesky things...!) that call into question the government's moon landings claims. THIS WELL-DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE HAS ALSO BEEN IGNORED! This includes the evidence that the government, media, academia, and the fake/phony moon-landing-'conspiracy'-debunkers ALL do not want people to know about!! My absolute favorite is the size of the reflection of the "Sun" [sic] in the visor face shields (oops!!!!!!!!!!!!). (Other favs include the total lack of any blast crater at all -- from the "retro-rockets" which supposedly "slowed" the "LEM" as it supposedly "softly lan!
ded on the Moon" -- in pictures showing "the Moon's surface" [sic] beneath the supposedly-already-"landed" "LEM" and also a complete lack of dust on the pod's landing feet. Also please note the official NASA narrative which says that the astronauts took off the boots of their "space suits", THEN opened the door of the LEM [oops!!!] and tossed them out, onto "the surface of the Moon"!!! Also please note how far backward "space suit technology" has gone -- anti-progressed -- in the past 40 years... And then there's the inflatable "moon rover" video, yikes! How blind and gullible can We The People be?) Alas, it's not easy to fake reality... even for governments!

Physics doesn't lie, but (all) governments, including the U.S.'s, do...!!!

Surprise, surprise, the government lies!

BTW, have any skepticproject "skeptics" noticed how 9/11 has been used to create enemy _and_ "homeland" -- a fearful paranoid delusional nation which goes militarily marauding around the world, invading sovereign nations, not just contrary to the lessons of Nuremberg, but consistent with Nazi ("preventive/preemptive war", LOL!) behavior? Or were they all still too shocked and awed, and afraid of "flying monkeys"(, and fearfully looking towards the lying incompetent rogue renegade U.S. govt/military for "protection")?

Why are multiple skepticproject identities so averse to striking at the lies that have [been] spread like disease through Our minds? Are they too afraid of having the label "conspiracy theorist" wrongly applied to them? Are skepticproject "skeptics" brave Dorothys or chickenshit (cowardly/fearful//foolish) Dorothys? (Or just noisy amateur monkey-see-monkey-do wannabe disinformers? Or some of each...?)

Why can't the skepticproject "skeptics" pay any attention to any of the men behind the curtains?

Yap yap,

- Toto

PS: Alex Jones is yet another plane-hugging 9/11 disinformer! Ron Paul is NO better. Nor is anyone else who ignores/avoids/dismisses/disparages the hijacker-exculpatory 9/11 evidence. Which means that there are precisely 535 treason whores in Congress! Are they mistaken, or lying, or putting loyalty to (the lies of) a "national security state" ahead of the Constitution? YES! (Either way, it's still TREASON.) So do you still take sides in diversionary, divide-and-conquer Dem-Rep scrimmages? (Are you also a big fan of professional wrestling???) NOW HEAR THIS: FAKE OPPOSITION FOOLS MOST OF THE PEOPLE MOST OF THE TIME!

It's virtually impossible to "think critically" if one becomes emotional*, or lets labels (such as the typically-misused, pejorative "conspiracy theorist" label) do one's 'thinking'. If you are completely unable to recognize that, by definition, "19 hijackers did all that" _IS_ a conspiracy theory (a rather wild, large, unwieldy, unsound, hateful, physically-impossible discredited/disproven one, at that!), and that people who still cling to that mainstreamed conspiracy theory are thus conspiracy theorists, then perhaps you ought to consider finding another avocation, or some other self-amusing howling diversion/agenda...

* Is it true that those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it?

"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in The Big Lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to The Big Lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

"It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."

- Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf

[ No response ]